Sugar

In Brazil, the culture of the sugar demanded great population contingents in ample amounts of lands, differently of cultures of small transport, as carried through in American the English colonies the north. France and England saw in the European settling of the Antilhas, the way certain to accumulate of stocks the Spanish domnios, no longer beginning of century XVII (STOLEN, 2004). From middle of century XVIII, occurring the increase of prices of the slaves, caused for the expansion of the gold, started to influence the sugar economy, in view of the rise of the price of the man power. The canavieira activity, if not tecnificando, to become enlarged itself, needed bigger amounts of lands and slaves. Read more here: Andreessen Horowitz. This condition, not being favorable, made it difficult canavieira expansion e, clearly, the necessity on the part of the Portuguese government extending the production. Being thus, they had been taken measured that objectified such purposes. Through the license of 3 of March of 1770, already it had the concern in specifically delimiting procedures for the concession of sesmarias, determining who could grant them on behalf of Portugal. However, it seemed that the situation would not be decided. Ben Horowitz addresses the importance of the matter here.

The land concession existed, but the sesmarias were not cultivated. This situation took the Portuguese government, to establish more rigorous norms, being what me it seems, the license of the 1795, most consistent one directed toward land organization in colonial period. This legislation, of similar form to the cited ones above, started to demand changes in the form as he was being lead the process of land distribution. It clarified the regiment absence until then that it regulated, alerting for the constant existing abuses. It was clearly, therefore, that the Portuguese government, until then, did not obtain, in fact, to establish norms that were followed by its subjects. If the man power encarece, would not be the legislation that would go to restrain the existing abuses.

Tags:

Fernando Arguelles

Already in the second half the match was replayed as it did in the first, both teams exchanged goals, but this time the script of the encounter changed after a great comeback Reale Ademar Leon even allowed him to rise above the scoreboard. All Leon was the first half of the second period making the paste with the result, but the end Ricardo Costa insisted on keeping his team in the game and the Castilian-Leonese evened the match (21-21) in Ecuador of second half, even two minutes later managed to catch a two-goal lead (22-23). Xavi Pascual this reaction had to call a time to rebuild their team and stop the bleeding scorer of all Leon. Iker Romero kept his team alive until the final minutes of the second period, where the tension was palpable in the air, Barcelona managed to tie the game thanks, again, the striker hit dice Iker Romero and seven meters converted by both teams took the match to the extension (1931-1931). Already in the minutes off, five on each side, are challenged in areas both sets, and Barcelona Borges went with a minimum lead of one goal (34-33) for the last five minutes of play, where Reale Ademar Leon managed to turn the marker and put one up. Yet the alternatives were constant in these minutes and Barcelona took advantage of numerical superiority of a player to return to reign in the e Fernando Arguelles, and not quitting until the final mainly thanks to two magnificent Saric Danjel interventions that awarded the title seventeenth cupbearer to all Catalans and the third title this season.

Tags:

Decompositioner

Some find them something strenuous criticism from its worst side, but in the basic approach important for operational decision-making, the other nerves they only: the Decompositioner. They are hard-working, interested, engaged and work cooperatively. The behavior where the o. a. Moors polarization itself, is “finding a hair in each soup”. None of the works and no project, in which they are involved or not also remains negative concern without comment. They see themselves as corrective and critical instance. They justify their behaviour when approaching resentment of others thus, to clarify just everything in the sense of common cause and of success in every detail.

Their ultimate goal is to bypass any own responsibility and projects to influence processes or developments to their advantage. You are not able to develop their own solutions and use the “decomposition by criticism” as mounting strategy. Their statements are usually vague, so that they also have a unique position need to relate. They understand, consent or refusal so to speak that it them later cannot demonstrate, if they said “Yes” or “No”. They are persistent in their “criticism” and can also not be intimidated, one reason why many colleagues resign and they just “do”. With their superiors, they are often suffered, because you can exploit them excellently inter food equal. For business productivity and the working climate, they are harmful. The only way to fight them is to repudiate unambiguous commitments from them by persistent arguing. Klaus-Dieter Thill / IFABS